Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Abdal Qahir's avatar

I understand what you mean by your portrayal of "whiteness" as a concept indicating the privilege to oppress, but it is a rather bizarre term for the non-American ear to hear. Israel is less modelled on American conceptions of whiteness and more on the German dichotomy of the รœbermensch โ€” everything that happens in the West Bank is a clear reflection that the Israelis believe Palestinians are รผntermensch who need to be cleared off the rightful Lebensraum of the Israeli people. Drawing a comparison between Israel and the regime that persecuted the Jewish peoples of Europe is far more rhetorically effective, in my opinion.

Expand full comment
American Nobody's avatar

Good post, but you are missing a lot here. Among many things, you are missing the fact that the Ashkenazi were considered terrorists as recently as 1950. You are also overlooking the fact that nearly all, probably all, of these organizations now attacking Israel for committing an undeniable genocide were for the last 4 decades attacking "whites" for being white. "White males" the most hated of all. Now that "Jews" have become the target, oh my, it's become wrong. Funny how that works.

I told them this would happen. I told them that it would inherently generalize on the basis of the most basic physical characteristics. Did they listen? Nooooooooo. They said I had "white privilege" and told me to go fuck myself.

That was when they were riding the back of this Frankenstein they themselves created. Now it's seen Israel, and they are all a fuss. So incredibly smart, yet so fucking short sighted and utterly retarded. That's the fucking Ashkenazi for you.

The freaking Ashkenazi never "became white," you twit. They have worked for the utter destruction of anything that can be conceived of as "white" for the last 4 decades. They have openly and consistently advocated for the genocide of "whites," that is, non-"Jews." And what was a huge part of this? Mounting the backs of minorities and whipping them into line as a frontal attack upon "whites," you idiot.

Golly gee wiz, what was the role of "Jews" in the slave trade and ownership? Do tell. What was the percentage of "whites" at that horrible time that owned slaves? Look it up, warmonger.

Strings strings strings; they pulled strings then, they pull strings now. And when they aren't pulling strings, they are changing both their names and the definitions of key words. Wake up, fool.

This is the Ashkenazi way of war. "Jew" is not an appropriate term--stats got them down as well over 80 percent hard core atheists. These were the Bolsheviks, these were the original Zionists. Look it up, "race man." My words are true.

And there you are, a so-called "educator," sticking to the line. It's "white people." Never mind that the krauts are different from the frogs who are different from the Brits who are different from the Irish. Na, never mind anything that gets in the way of your racial vision.

Make it all simple, so you can hold your job, while you continue to incite violence and war and disdain the very culture that created the institution in which you now work.

No wonder Islam is progressing. You stink, you are empty, and you are a warmongering pig.

Screw you, pall.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts